Do
you ever get the impression that everything you have ever learned,
been taught about, indoctrinated into, about a certain subject, is
utter baloney, like all of it? How about “racism”, that most
pernicious of evils - so we are told. What is the UK experience?
The
word was coined in the 1930s by Magnus Hirschfeld, and was used but
seldom until the 1960s, like anywhere. About that time, people of a
certain political persuasion in the UK began using the word
“racialism”, which is of a slightly older vintage, then “racism”
superseded it, becoming common currency. Here it was used in a very
unsubtle yet successful attempt to brainwash both the gullible
“goyim” and the equally gullible non-“goyim” into acceptance
of both massive waves of non-white immigration and race-mixing.
The
usual method was to juxtapose photographs from the Nazi concentration
camps - principally Belsen and Dachau - with photographs of the
“Nazis” of the day, and to associate them with any antipathy
towards immigration. And it worked, primarily because of the massive
funding anti-“racist” groups received from the right as much as
from the left, hysteria in the media, and eventually the fear
ordinary people had of being branded “racist”. Few stopped to
think that they, their fathers and grandfathers had fought two world
wars to keep out the foreigner and preserve the integrity of this
island race only to surrender to invaders from all over the globe
without a shot being fired.
By
the 1990s, the efficacy of the Nazi angle was beginning to wane,
partly because there were relatively few people left who had lived
through the Second World War, and partly because many people across a
broad political spectrum sympathised with the plight of the
Palestinians. The Nazis were in the distant past but their “victims”
were suddenly victims no more. The horror of the death camps - real
and imagined - was replaced with the murder of Stephen Lawrence, the
type of kid you might actually have met, unlike Heinrich Himmler.
The
full extent of this brainwashing needs no relating here, but it will
suffice to say that we - namely anyone white and especially English -
was to be viewed as thoroughly evil and bigoted. Now let me refute
all that garbage with one word: Sangatte. In case that is not
familiar to you, it was the location of a Red Cross asylum centre
which was closed in 2002. Less than 55 miles as the crow flies from
Dover, asylum seekers (so-called) queued up there in their masses to
cross the English Channel by fair means or foul. Now here is the $64
million question, if the English especially are such horrible people,
why would anyone - black or other - want to live here? Add to this
the fact that France isn’t exactly an inhospitable place, at least
it wasn’t the one time I was there briefly 22 years ago.
The
bottom line is that no one from Africa nor anywhere else - whether
genuine asylum seeker or more often economic migrant - no one in
either of those categories who has made his way to France need seek
asylum in the UK, yet they did and they still do. Why, if we are such
terrible people?
Now
let’s look at the United States, which has an entirely different
and more painful racial heritage than the UK, that of slavery, and
let us not forget of course that the original inhabitants of that
great continent are now a disenfranchised minority, as the natives of
these islands are swiftly becoming. Nevertheless, slavery was ended
with the American Civil War, and Blacks have made great strides since
then, although the same cannot be said for the Red Man. What though
are we led to believe about the US? Only that slavery did not end
with the American Civil War, that it did not end with the contrived
judgment in Brown v Topeka, nor with the staged Rosa Parks bus
protest the following year but maybe, just maybe with the misnamed
Civil Rights Act of 1964. What was it that King bloke said, I
have a dream? Now let me debunk all that with two words: Chuck Berry.
Earlier
this year I was shopping in my local supermarket; the cashier was a
young black girl wearing a name badge, Nadine. As I paid for my
purchases I asked her is your Dad a Chuck Berry fan? For those who do
not share even my less than formidable knowledge of contemporary
music, Berry recorded a song called Nadine...in 1964. I was
surprised at her response: “Who’s Chuck Berry?” Like seriously.
Somehow I don’t think she would have asked “Who’s Stephen
Lawrence?” who is clearly a far more important icon to most of the
brainwashed blacks - and whites - of the youth of today. Not
infrequently people talk of his legacy; Stephen Lawrence has no
legacy because he never achieved anything; that wasn’t his fault of
course, one might say the same thing about Sarah Payne, who was
struck down at the age of eight in similar cruel fashion. But how can
any black kid in the US or the UK not have heard of Chuck Berry?
Berry
has written a lot of songs. Like Nadine...his 1955 single No Money Down is not particularly well known. Here is what he said
about it; the song “got its origin from the salesman’s pitch that
I usually got when buying my first few cars”.
Berry
was born in 1926, and bought his first car as a teenager, a 1934 V8
Ford, for $10 down and $5 a month - he was too young to sign the hire
purchase agreement, so his older sister Thelma did the honours. In
his autobiography, he says he went through a dozen automobiles in 12
years or less.
I
realise I’m not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but perhaps
Doreen Lawrence or better still Angela Yvonne Davis can explain to me
how someone who was so “oppressed”, little more than a slave,
could have afforded to buy a car at that young age? But it gets
worse, in 1944 on account of youthful follies, Berry received a ten
year sentence, and might have disappeared into obscurity; instead he
became arguably the biggest name in rock ’n’ roll, and inarguably
the most influential figure in contemporary music. If there had been
no Chuck Berry there would have been no Beatles, no Rolling Stones,
no Eric Clapton, and probably no Pink Floyd either.
Okay,
he had luck as well as talent, but exceptional though his story is,
it is far from unique, so why in the wake of recent events in
Ferguson do we hear only about “racism”, more “racism” and
yet more “racism”, which has expanded into a myriad forms, but
structural “racism” and institutional “racism” appear to top
the list at the moment.
The
reality is that the entire narrative is wrong, all of it. Period. As
Kent Steffgen wrote in his 1966 book...Bondage Of The Free...“The
Civil Rights Movement has publicized itself as a drive for economic
advancement for the Negro but actually revolves about an attempt to
invade the social privacy of whites”.
He
points out too that at that time, American Negroes owned 4.5 million
automobiles, almost one for every four persons, while in the then
Soviet Union there was one car for every 350 people, and most of
those were owned either by the state or by apparatchiks. That being
the case, was it really such a terrible thing to be a Negro in even
the American Deep South? Was it so degrading to have to use different
water fountains and rest rooms, or was this something most people
simply didn’t notice or bother about until hordes of “liberals”
- including many Jews - descended on them en masse to tell
them how oppressed they were, and stir up animosity in communities
that had for the most part lived amicably side by side for
generations?
To
acknowledge this fact is not to whitewash the Deep South, the murder
of Emmett Till and other occasional outrages, the big question is
what do Blacks have there today what they didn’t have in the 1950s
when Chuck Berry was launched on an unsuspecting world? What they
don’t have are stable communities, because with the outlawing of
segregation, and more importantly the forced race-mixing and
brainwashing that followed, there are no Black “communities”
anymore; the doctor, the lawyer, the accountant, have all moved out
leaving only the ghetto, or the hood as it is now known. The reason
for this is, yes, you guessed it, “racism” - ie evil white men,
and the solution, more anti-“racism”, ie more race-mixing.
When
will the liberals and the race-mixers be satisfied? When the last
white woman turns child-bearing age, and who will they blame then?
No comments:
Post a Comment